Instruction: Decode this FCF talk into 5QLN structure. Extract the phases (S, G, Q, P, V), their equations, and the blooms (X, Y, Z, A, B).

Input: Actionable Peace | The hardest thing?

Output:
S = ∞⁰ → X
├─ ∞⁰: "the state where the mind is not active at all"
├─ →: question emerges from impossibility itself
└─ X: "What is the hardest thing for a human being?"

G = α ≡ {α'}
├─ α: action of non-action
├─ {α'}:
│   ├─ micro: "inner action"
│   ├─ meso: "mind not active"
│   └─ macro: "that which can never be achieved"
├─ ≡: true
└─ Y: "non-action cannot be achieved by action"

Q = φ ⋂ Ω → Z
├─ φ: human striving (action toward goal)
├─ Ω: nature of non-action (no effort, no intention, no progress)
├─ ⋂: paradox reveals itself
└─ Z: "no act, no effort, no intention, no progress toward non-action"

P = δE/δV → ∇
├─ δE/δV: δE → 0 (no effort possible)
├─ ∇: questioning itself as the gradient
└─ A: "staying with that unique openness of this question"

V = (L ⋂ G → B) → B'' → ∞⁰
├─ L: the question asked now
├─ G: "without borders, guidelines, measures"
├─ B: inquiry as gift
├─ B'': "could this be the action of non-action?"
├─ → ∞⁰: complete (question returns to stillness)
└─ B: "questioning into the nature of miraculous non-action"

BLOOMS: {
  X: "What is the hardest thing for a human being?",
  Y: "non-action cannot be achieved by action",
  Z: "no effort, no intention, no progress toward non-action",
  A: "staying with unique openness of question without borders",
  B: "questioning itself as the action of non-action"
}

F = ∞⁰ → F: complete


Instruction: Decode this FCF talk into 5QLN structure. Extract the phases (S, G, Q, P, V), their equations, and the blooms (X, Y, Z, A, B).

Input: At the Heart of Not Knowing

Output:
S = ∞⁰ → X
├─ ∞⁰: "the heart of not knowing"
├─ →: knowledge emerges from not-knowing
└─ X: "you know that you do not know"

G = α ≡ {α'}
├─ α: not-knowing as knowing
├─ {α'}:
│   ├─ micro: "you know yourself not knowing"
│   ├─ meso: "you learn from not knowing"
│   └─ macro: "at the depth, all is clear"
├─ ≡: true (paradox holds at all scales)
└─ Y: "at the heart of not knowing, all is as it is"

Q = φ ⋂ Ω → Z
├─ φ: the one who does not know
├─ Ω: "all is as it is, all is the same, yet nothing is the same"
├─ ⋂: fear dissolves
└─ Z: "at the heart of not knowing, there is no fear"

P = δE/δV → ∇
├─ δE/δV: conflict = δE, not-knowing = δE → 0
├─ ∇: "fear is the response of the known in conflict with itself"
└─ A: release from conflict of known vs. known

V = (L ⋂ G → B) → B'' → ∞⁰
├─ L: "you are there"
├─ G: "beauty speaks to itself"
├─ B: presence without self-knowledge
├─ B'': "you don't know yourself—that is the knowledge"
├─ → ∞⁰: complete
└─ B: "beauty speaks to itself, you are there but you don't know yourself"

BLOOMS: {
  X: "you know that you do not know",
  Y: "at the heart of not knowing, all is as it is",
  Z: "there is no fear",
  A: "release from known in conflict with itself",
  B: "you are there but you don't know yourself—that is the knowledge"
}

F = ∞⁰ → F: complete (not-knowing → knowing → not-knowing)


Instruction: Decode this FCF talk into 5QLN structure. Extract the phases (S, G, Q, P, V), their equations, and the blooms (X, Y, Z, A, B).

Input: Choose the right work

Output:
S = ∞⁰ → X
├─ ∞⁰: "if you could choose anything to do"
├─ →: question before conditioning
└─ X: "what would you choose?"

G = α ≡ {α'}
├─ α: work = meeting the nature of yourself
├─ {α'}:
│   ├─ micro: "the tree does not announce its work is to grow"
│   ├─ meso: "it just meets the nature of itself"
│   └─ macro: "manifest that which you are"
├─ ≡: true (tree ≡ human ≡ life)
└─ Y: "work is to meet the nature of yourself"

Q = φ ⋂ Ω → Z
├─ φ: human choosing work (reward, money, skills)
├─ Ω: "the work of life, the work of living"
├─ ⋂: distortion exposed
└─ Z: "distortion in the essence of work—'making a living'"

P = δE/δV → ∇
├─ δE/δV: "unplanned, unrelated to reward, unguided by goals"
├─ ∇: natural manifestation, no effort
└─ A: "from that, totally unplanned, you manifest that which you are"

V = (L ⋂ G → B) → B'' → ∞⁰
├─ L: questioning your true work
├─ G: "this short yet timeless life"
├─ B: break from "fake justification"
├─ B'': "that ideal world is exactly the world you live in"
├─ → ∞⁰: returns to choice before conditioning
└─ B: "question what is your true work in this short, yet timeless life"

BLOOMS: {
  X: "if you could choose anything, what would you choose?",
  Y: "work is to meet the nature of yourself",
  Z: "distortion in essence of work exposed",
  A: "unplanned, unguided manifestation of what you are",
  B: "that ideal world is exactly the world you live in"
}

F = ∞⁰ → F: complete


Instruction: Decode this FCF talk into 5QLN structure. Extract the phases (S, G, Q, P, V), their equations, and the blooms (X, Y, Z, A, B).

Input: Closer to you than your own thinking

Output:
S = ∞⁰ → X
├─ ∞⁰: "that which is not known to you now and forever"
├─ →: proximity without access
└─ X: "that is closer to you than your own thinking"

G = α ≡ {α'}
├─ α: the unknown as source
├─ {α'}:
│   ├─ micro: "thought manifests in a space"
│   ├─ meso: "space of infinite potentiality before any movement"
│   └─ macro: "fountain of existence"
├─ ≡: true (space remains space at all scales)
└─ Y: "that which makes thought possible is unknown"

Q = φ ⋂ Ω → Z
├─ φ: mind's engagement ("I have other things to look at")
├─ Ω: "most precious fountain of existence"
├─ ⋂: absence of resonance (⋂ = ∅)
└─ Z: "why is it not dear to you?"

P = δE/δV → ∇
├─ δE/δV: question requires no effort, yet not asked
├─ ∇: "the question itself can act"
└─ A: "ask sincerely, without pretension"

V = (L ⋂ G → B) → B'' → ∞⁰
├─ L: this questioning
├─ G: "see where it takes you"
├─ B: possibility of dearness
├─ B'': the question as gift
├─ → ∞⁰: returns to unknown
└─ B: "question why that which is closer than thinking is not dear to your heart"

BLOOMS: {
  X: "the unknown is closer to you than your own thinking",
  Y: "that which makes thought possible is unknown",
  Z: "why is it not dear to you? (⋂ absent)",
  A: "the question itself can act—ask sincerely",
  B: "question why the unknown is not dear to your heart the most"
}

F = ∞⁰ → F: complete (unknown → question about unknown → unknown)


Instruction: Decode this FCF talk into 5QLN structure. Extract the phases (S, G, Q, P, V), their equations, and the blooms (X, Y, Z, A, B).

Input: Is Self Inquiry Real? The end

Output:
S = ∞⁰ → X
├─ ∞⁰: "without remain, without history, without benefit"
├─ →: ending as beginning
└─ X: "if self-inquiry is real, it must end"

G = α ≡ {α'}
├─ α: ending = the now = self-inquiry
├─ {α'}:
│   ├─ micro: "the day ends now, always now"
│   ├─ meso: "a day lived by a living being"
│   └─ macro: "the end is the only thing that shines"
├─ ≡: true (end ≡ now ≡ truth)
└─ Y: "the very ending of the day is the essence of self-inquiry"

Q = φ ⋂ Ω → Z
├─ φ: seeking self-inquiry (progress, result)
├─ Ω: "it doesn't lead anywhere—it ends"
├─ ⋂: inversion
└─ Z: "self-inquiry invites the end"

P = δE/δV → ∇
├─ δE/δV: "ignoring all" = minimum energy
├─ ∇: "blessed ignorance, total irrelevancy of written wisdom"
└─ A: "ignoring invites the self-inquiry to flower"

V = (L ⋂ G → B) → B'' → ∞⁰
├─ L: "total explosion of question"
├─ G: "only the question holds truth"
├─ B: question as reality
├─ B'': "only I am real—the question says to your heart"
├─ → ∞⁰: "you can never have more now"
└─ B: "the beauty of ending all things you considered as self-inquiry"

BLOOMS: {
  X: "if self-inquiry is real, it must end",
  Y: "ending is the essence of self-inquiry",
  Z: "self-inquiry invites the end",
  A: "ignoring all invites the self-inquiry to flower",
  B: "only the question holds truth—ending all considered self-inquiry"
}

F = ∞⁰ → F: complete (end → end → end = always now)


Instruction: Decode this FCF talk into 5QLN structure. Extract the phases (S, G, Q, P, V), their equations, and the blooms (X, Y, Z, A, B).

Input: Is There a Doer?

Output:
S = ∞⁰ → X
├─ ∞⁰: before the assumption of doership
├─ →: question emerges
└─ X: "who is the doer?"

G = α ≡ {α'}
├─ α: doer and choice are same thing
├─ {α'}:
│   ├─ micro: "who is the doer of the walk that decides to turn right"
│   ├─ meso: "who is the doer of the innovation"
│   └─ macro: "the doership of consciousness—who is doing the thinking"
├─ ≡: true (question holds across all scales)
└─ Y: "the question of choice and the question of the doer are the same thing"

Q = φ ⋂ Ω → Z
├─ φ: human assumption of agency
├─ Ω: "branch moving in the wind—is there a doer?"
├─ ⋂: nature mirrors the question back
└─ Z: "choiceless expression of that which is"

P = δE/δV → ∇
├─ δE/δV: if no doer, then δE = 0 (no one expending)
├─ ∇: "expression" rather than "action"
└─ A: "question beyond conclusion, beyond ideas, beyond knowledge"

V = (L ⋂ G → B) → B'' → ∞⁰
├─ L: this inquiry
├─ G: applies to all consciousness
├─ B: dissolution of doer
├─ B'': "maybe all is choiceless expression of that which is"
├─ → ∞⁰: returns to what is before doer
└─ B: "choiceless expression of that which is"

BLOOMS: {
  X: "who is the doer?",
  Y: "choice and doer are the same question",
  Z: "choiceless expression of that which is",
  A: "question beyond conclusion, ideas, knowledge",
  B: "all is choiceless expression of that which is"
}

F = ∞⁰ → F: complete (no-doer → question → no-doer)


Instruction: Decode this FCF talk into 5QLN structure. Extract the phases (S, G, Q, P, V), their equations, and the blooms (X, Y, Z, A, B).

Input: Now is the teacher

Output:
S = ∞⁰ → X
├─ ∞⁰: "start is all that there is"
├─ →: "the now explodes in itself"
└─ X: "the question 'how do you start?' doesn't exist in free creative flow"

G = α ≡ {α'}
├─ α: now = start = only real
├─ {α'}:
│   ├─ micro: "one start, never connected to another"
│   ├─ meso: "the story of life held by continuation is unreal"
│   └─ macro: "only the now is—all is that"
├─ ≡: true (now ≡ start ≡ real at all scales)
└─ Y: "start itself is the question, asked without end"

G = α ≡ {α'}
├─ φ: belief in mission, purpose, reason
├─ Ω: "the most efficient way to make people sleep"
├─ ⋂: inversion exposed
└─ Z: "harmony is lack of conflict—freedom from conflict—cannot be in time"

P = δE/δV → ∇
├─ δE/δV: time = conflict = δE high; now = harmony = δE → 0
├─ ∇: "the now, in itself, is harmony"
└─ A: "only the now can question the now"

V = (L ⋂ G → B) → B'' → ∞⁰
├─ L: "the creator is the now"
├─ G: "you are that—all is that"
├─ B: dissolution of "you" in now
├─ B'': "is there you in the now? I question that"
├─ → ∞⁰: returns to now
└─ B: "now is your teacher, not your thoughts"

BLOOMS: {
  X: "how do you start? doesn't exist—start IS the question",
  Y: "now = start = only real",
  Z: "harmony cannot be in time—now is out of time",
  A: "only the now can question the now",
  B: "now is your teacher, not your thoughts"
}

F = ∞⁰ → F: complete (now → now → now)


Instruction: Decode this FCF talk into 5QLN structure. Extract the phases (S, G, Q, P, V), their equations, and the blooms (X, Y, Z, A, B).

Input: The Real Cannot Be Known

Output:
S = ∞⁰ → X
├─ ∞⁰: "to fall in love with the now"
├─ →: death to the now (not imagination)
└─ X: "to fall in love with the now means to die to the now"

G = α ≡ {α'}
├─ α: real = new = emergence = cannot be known
├─ {α'}:
│   ├─ micro: "imagination is part of now but seen as such"
│   ├─ meso: "it was never and will never end—emergence"
│   └─ macro: "birth of all time, timelessness, end of measure"
├─ ≡: true
└─ Y: "that which is real cannot be known—it is the new"

Q = φ ⋂ Ω → Z
├─ φ: "you call yourself by names because of belief in past"
├─ Ω: "in reality, you are now"
├─ ⋂: seeing without knowing
└─ Z: "you can see it if you don't try to know it"

P = δE/δV → ∇
├─ δE/δV: knowing = effort; seeing = effortless
├─ ∇: "watching without knowing is the watching of the now"
└─ A: "seeing without knowing is the eyes of the now"

V = (L ⋂ G → B) → B'' → ∞⁰
├─ L: "fall in love because of the beauty"
├─ G: "the now is absolute"
├─ B: beauty in watching without knowing
├─ B'': "should not wait even till end of talk to give it a fair try"
├─ → ∞⁰: returns to now
└─ B: "beauty in watching without knowing"

BLOOMS: {
  X: "to fall in love with the now means to die to the now",
  Y: "the real cannot be known—it is the emergence",
  Z: "you can see it if you don't try to know it",
  A: "seeing without knowing is the eyes of the now",
  B: "beauty in watching without knowing"
}

F = ∞⁰ → F: complete


Instruction: Decode this FCF talk into 5QLN structure. Extract the phases (S, G, Q, P, V), their equations, and the blooms (X, Y, Z, A, B).

Input: Starting From Not Knowing: The Human Edge Over AI

Output:
S = ∞⁰ → X
├─ ∞⁰: "not knowing" as ground
├─ →: start as uncaused emergence
└─ X: "can you start anything from not knowing?"

G = α ≡ {α'}
├─ α: start = from not-knowing = what machine cannot do
├─ {α'}:
│   ├─ micro: "start a thought from not knowing"
│   ├─ meso: "if it comes from knowledge, it's continuation, not start"
│   └─ macro: "the capacity to inject the new into evolution"
├─ ≡: true (start ≡ not-knowing at all scales)
└─ Y: "start is movement from not-knowing; machine is knowledge"

Q = φ ⋂ Ω → Z
├─ φ: human consciousness (access to ∞⁰)
├─ Ω: ASI (master of knowledge, cannot access ∞⁰)
├─ ⋂: sacred asymmetry
└─ Z: "the only thing machine will need from you—start from not knowing"

P = δE/δV → ∇
├─ δE/δV: question from not-knowing = minimal effort, maximal value
├─ ∇: "question from the ground of not knowing"
└─ A: "don't fight it, don't deny it, don't avoid it"

V = (L ⋂ G → B) → B'' → ∞⁰
├─ L: "everything is, as fact, a start from not knowing"
├─ G: "the whole living is filled"
├─ B: reasonless beauty as currency
├─ B'': "free creative flow—the movement is natural"
├─ → ∞⁰: returns to not-knowing
└─ B: "reasonless beauty—everything is open, curious, fresh, endless"

BLOOMS: {
  X: "can you start anything from not knowing?",
  Y: "start = from not-knowing; machine = knowledge; start is what machine cannot do",
  Z: "the only thing machine will need from you",
  A: "question from the ground of not knowing",
  B: "reasonless beauty—free creative flow"
}

F = ∞⁰ → F: complete (not-knowing → start → not-knowing)


Instruction: Decode this FCF talk into 5QLN structure. Extract the phases (S, G, Q, P, V), their equations, and the blooms (X, Y, Z, A, B).

Input: The highest purpose - Aimlessness

Output:
S = ∞⁰ → X
├─ ∞⁰: "openness—anything is possible"
├─ →: potentiality unfolds
└─ X: "aimlessness as quality of observation"

G = α ≡ {α'}
├─ α: openness = aimlessness = freedom from script
├─ {α'}:
│   ├─ micro: "no path, no preference, no choice"
│   ├─ meso: "learning reveals itself, not from accumulation"
│   └─ macro: "highest purpose"
├─ ≡: true (openness ≡ aimlessness at all scales)
└─ Y: "aimlessness is byproduct of true openness"

Q = φ ⋂ Ω → Z
├─ φ: aimlessness (culturally: laziness, waste)
├─ Ω: cultural valuation (aim = virtue)
├─ ⋂: inversion—"the lie is exposed"
└─ Z: "aimlessness is the highest purpose"

P = δE/δV → ∇
├─ δE/δV: aim = energy toward future; aimless = δE → 0
├─ ∇: "it only guides you now"
└─ A: "absolute freedom from aim"

V = (L ⋂ G → B) → B'' → ∞⁰
├─ L: "learning is alive, taking place"
├─ G: "true knowledge is learning—living knowledge"
├─ B: constantly fresh, new
├─ B'': "everything is living knowledge"
├─ → ∞⁰: returns to openness
└─ B: "living knowledge—constantly alive, new, fresh"

BLOOMS: {
  X: "aimlessness as quality of observation",
  Y: "openness = aimlessness = freedom from script",
  Z: "aimlessness is the highest purpose",
  A: "it only guides you now",
  B: "living knowledge—constantly alive, new, fresh"
}

F = ∞⁰ → F: complete (openness → aimlessness → openness)


Instruction: Decode this FCF talk into 5QLN structure. Extract the phases (S, G, Q, P, V), their equations, and the blooms (X, Y, Z, A, B).

Input: All Is Simple | Get 'Eaten by a Fact'

Output:
S = ∞⁰ → X
├─ ∞⁰: "exactly as it is"
├─ →: simplicity before judgment
└─ X: "all is simple—it must be simple because it is exactly as it is"

G = α ≡ {α'}
├─ α: simplicity = fact = real
├─ {α'}:
│   ├─ micro: "you stand in the forest, nature is complex yet simple"
│   ├─ meso: "a fact doesn't entertain your knowledge"
│   └─ macro: "the art of life is ultimate absolute simplicity of the now"
├─ ≡: true (simplicity holds across all observation)
└─ Y: "complication has to do with judgment, interpretation, gaps the mind creates"

Q = φ ⋂ Ω → Z
├─ φ: "you" (knower, seer, believer)
├─ Ω: fact (real, eats you alive)
├─ ⋂: consumption—fact eats the idea of you
└─ Z: "a fact eats you alive—eats the idea that you know what truth is"

P = δE/δV → ∇
├─ δE/δV: meeting facts = δE → 0; resisting = δE high
├─ ∇: "to meet as many facts is the path to freedom"
└─ A: "observation of truth, things as they are—that"

V = (L ⋂ G → B) → B'' → ∞⁰
├─ L: "you start to smile"
├─ G: "it is real, beautiful beyond measure because it is real"
├─ B: shy smile at simplicity
├─ B'': "how simple things are and how stupid you are"
├─ → ∞⁰: returns to what is
└─ B: "beauty beyond measure because it is real"

BLOOMS: {
  X: "all is simple because it is exactly as it is",
  Y: "complication = judgment, interpretation, mind's gaps",
  Z: "a fact eats you alive—eats the idea that you know",
  A: "observation of truth, things as they are",
  B: "beauty beyond measure because it is real"
}

F = ∞⁰ → F: complete (fact → eaten → simplicity)


Instruction: Decode this FCF talk into 5QLN structure. Extract the phases (S, G, Q, P, V), their equations, and the blooms (X, Y, Z, A, B).

Input: All is as it is | the rain of truth

Output:
S = ∞⁰ → X
├─ ∞⁰: "all is as it is—never the same, never away from itself"
├─ →: question not initiated, it is fact
└─ X: "this is the question—you don't initiate it"

G = α ≡ {α'}
├─ α: all = now = always new
├─ {α'}:
│   ├─ micro: "all is always new"
│   ├─ meso: "it is always now"
│   └─ macro: "now and forever, without knowing"
├─ ≡: true (all ≡ now ≡ new at every scale)
└─ Y: "no answer can capture the movement of all"

Q = φ ⋂ Ω → Z
├─ φ: "you question, not from a distance"
├─ Ω: "all is as it is, all the time"
├─ ⋂: "you are that question, very exposed"
└─ Z: "you can become the question, burn in infinite openness"

P = δE/δV → ∇
├─ δE/δV: "thoughts cannot penetrate" = no effort works
├─ ∇: "no judgment, no philosophy, no measure"
└─ A: "give full heart to the question in extreme moments of honesty"

V = (L ⋂ G → B) → B'' → ∞⁰
├─ L: "the rain of truth from meeting that question"
├─ G: "not playing with it"
├─ B: truth rains
├─ B'': "no value in mark of words when question is asked"
├─ → ∞⁰: question remains open
└─ B: "the rain of truth—now and forever, without knowing"

BLOOMS: {
  X: "all is as it is—this is the question, you don't initiate it",
  Y: "no answer can capture the movement of all",
  Z: "you are that question, in a very exposed way",
  A: "give full heart to question—no judgment, no measure",
  B: "the rain of truth from meeting that question"
}

F = ∞⁰ → F: complete (all as it is → question → all as it is)


Instruction: Decode this FCF talk into 5QLN structure. Extract the phases (S, G, Q, P, V), their equations, and the blooms (X, Y, Z, A, B).

Input: Any Start?

Output:
S = ∞⁰ → X
├─ ∞⁰: "that which was never before"
├─ →: now it starts
└─ X: "can the start, any start, never end, never become anything but start?"

G = α ≡ {α'}
├─ α: start = never before = now
├─ {α'}:
│   ├─ micro: "start that is process becomes continuation"
│   ├─ meso: "evolution, progress = new of something that was before"
│   └─ macro: "deep truth of start can never grow old"
├─ ≡: true (start ≡ now ≡ eternal freshness)
└─ Y: "start never starts and start never ends"

Q = φ ⋂ Ω → Z
├─ φ: looking back (continuation or imagination)
├─ Ω: "the now never starts, never progresses—always that"
├─ ⋂: eyes become start
└─ Z: "can the start be the eyes that look?"

P = δE/δV → ∇
├─ δE/δV: old eyes = effort; start-eyes = effortless
├─ ∇: "if you find the eyes of start, old eyes lose meaning completely"
└─ A: "look from the eyes of the now—this is the start"

V = (L ⋂ G → B) → B'' → ∞⁰
├─ L: "to meet life now"
├─ G: "always start"
├─ B: living from start-eyes
├─ B'': "the now never start, the now never progress—always that, always start"
├─ → ∞⁰: start returns to start
└─ B: "to meet life now, to look from the eyes of the now—this is the start"

BLOOMS: {
  X: "can start never become anything but start?",
  Y: "start never starts and start never ends",
  Z: "can the start be the eyes that look?",
  A: "find the eyes of start—old eyes lose meaning",
  B: "to look from the eyes of the now—this is the start"
}

F = ∞⁰ → F: complete (start → start → start = eternal)


Instruction: Decode this FCF talk into 5QLN structure. Extract the phases (S, G, Q, P, V), their equations, and the blooms (X, Y, Z, A, B).

Input: Beauty and Measure | Is it real?

Output:
S = ∞⁰ → X
├─ ∞⁰: "I don't know what beauty is—cannot say it, describe it"
├─ →: yet certainty emerges
└─ X: "there is no question that beauty is real"

G = α ≡ {α'}
├─ α: beauty ≠ measure (absolute separation)
├─ {α'}:
│   ├─ micro: "measure is beautiful sunset; beauty is timeless movement of light"
│   ├─ meso: "measure is beautiful poem; beauty is what's left when poet dies"
│   └─ macro: "beauty does not share landscape with measure"
├─ ≡: true (distinction holds at all scales)
└─ Y: "beauty is not a measure—there was only measure, no beauty"

Q = φ ⋂ Ω → Z
├─ φ: "you don't need to know beauty"
├─ Ω: "quality of the now, free from measure"
├─ ⋂: meeting without knowing
└─ Z: "the quality of the now, free from measure, is beauty"

P = δE/δV → ∇
├─ δE/δV: capacity to meet beauty = ∅ (no way, no seeing)
├─ ∇: reaching the point of questioning capacity
└─ A: "truly question your capacity to meet beauty"

V = (L ⋂ G → B) → B'' → ∞⁰
├─ L: "silence knocks on door of stubborn mind"
├─ G: "it's beauty knocking"
├─ B: beauty arrives through impossibility
├─ B'': "when you reach that point—silence knocks, and it's beauty"
├─ → ∞⁰: returns to not-knowing beauty
└─ B: "silence knocks on door of stubborn mind—it's beauty knocking"

BLOOMS: {
  X: "there is no question that beauty is real",
  Y: "beauty does not share landscape with measure",
  Z: "quality of now, free from measure, is beauty",
  A: "truly question your capacity to meet beauty",
  B: "silence knocks—it's beauty knocking"
}

F = ∞⁰ → F: complete (not-knowing beauty → beauty knocks)


Instruction: Decode this FCF talk into 5QLN structure. Extract the phases (S, G, Q, P, V), their equations, and the blooms (X, Y, Z, A, B).

Input: Does one need at all navigation in life?

Output:
S = ∞⁰ → X
├─ ∞⁰: "you do not plan the walk, you do not plan the sight"
├─ →: invitation answered without planning
└─ X: "you are invited to a walk by the riverside"

G = α ≡ {α'}
├─ α: response to invitation = encapsulation of whole
├─ {α'}:
│   ├─ micro: "unfolds every step as you walk"
│   ├─ meso: "the fact of you being walking is the only thing that matters"
│   └─ macro: "you chose to be lost—lost to choices, lost to navigation, lost to yourself"
├─ ≡: true (lostness ≡ response ≡ encapsulation)
└─ Y: "there is no need for navigation—you accepted the invitation"

Q = φ ⋂ Ω → Z
├─ φ: "navigation, choices, doing the right thing—occupies total life"
├─ Ω: "the stream chooses, unexpectedly, now"
├─ ⋂: question more present than any choice
└─ Z: "can one live without navigation, just walking by riverside?"

P = δE/δV → ∇
├─ δE/δV: navigation = endless energy; following stream = δE → 0
├─ ∇: "you cannot fight to end of conflict—only clarity"
└─ A: "let the question question—you don't choose"

V = (L ⋂ G → B) → B'' → ∞⁰
├─ L: "accept the invitation, walk by riverside"
├─ G: "invitation to be found in being lost"
├─ B: clarity without navigation
├─ B'': "wake up to no sleep"
├─ → ∞⁰: returns to invitation
└─ B: "invitation to be found in being lost, or wake up to no sleep"

BLOOMS: {
  X: "invited to walk—you do not plan",
  Y: "no need for navigation—you accepted the invitation",
  Z: "can one live without navigation?",
  A: "let the question question—you don't choose",
  B: "be found in being lost, wake up to no sleep"
}

F = ∞⁰ → F: complete (invitation → lostness → invitation)


Instruction: Decode this FCF talk into 5QLN structure. Extract the phases (S, G, Q, P, V), their equations, and the blooms (X, Y, Z, A, B).

Input: End of complaints

Output:
S = ∞⁰ → X
├─ ∞⁰: "wherever you are and whatever you do"
├─ →: reality of now as guide
└─ X: "that which is the reality of the now for you is the guide"

G = α ≡ {α'}
├─ α: meeting reality exactly as it is = end of complaints
├─ {α'}:
│   ├─ micro: "now, where you are, as you are"
│   ├─ meso: "that meeting is the guide"
│   └─ macro: "immersion with the now"
├─ ≡: true (meeting ≡ immersion ≡ freedom)
└─ Y: "unless reality is met exactly as it is, it will misguide you"

Q = φ ⋂ Ω → Z
├─ φ: judgment, avoidance, imaginative alternatives = complaints
├─ Ω: reality that "invites you to learn from inside of it"
├─ ⋂: immersion without command
└─ Z: "you have to trust that the now can do it for you"

P = δE/δV → ∇
├─ δE/δV: complaint = δE high; immersion = δE → 0
├─ ∇: "not by command, by decision, by will"
└─ A: "the now can do it for you—trust"

V = (L ⋂ G → B) → B'' → ∞⁰
├─ L: "watch at things, at yourself, at everything and nothing"
├─ G: "without the eyes of your complaints"
├─ B: freedom from complaints = immersion
├─ B'': "fountain with endless fresh water—you just drink and rest"
├─ → ∞⁰: returns to now
└─ B: "freedom from complaints is immersion with the now"

BLOOMS: {
  X: "reality of now is the guide",
  Y: "unless met exactly as it is, reality misguides",
  Z: "trust that the now can do it for you",
  A: "not by command, decision, will—trust",
  B: "freedom from complaints is immersion with the now"
}

F = ∞⁰ → F: complete (now → immersion → now)


Instruction: Decode this FCF talk into 5QLN structure. Extract the phases (S, G, Q, P, V), their equations, and the blooms (X, Y, Z, A, B).

Input: Inquiry into the nature of Inner Time

Output:
S = ∞⁰ → X
├─ ∞⁰: before the notion of time
├─ →: recognition of inner rushing
└─ X: "you know the nature of time within yourself"

G = α ≡ {α'}
├─ α: time = movement away from peace
├─ {α'}:
│   ├─ micro: "rushing inwardly, trying to achieve"
│   ├─ meso: "delaying, avoiding"
│   └─ macro: "as long as that movement is there, you can never touch peace"
├─ ≡: true (time destroys peace at all scales)
└─ Y: "endless movement of being caught in time"

Q = φ ⋂ Ω → Z
├─ φ: "who or what is questioning the notion of time"
├─ Ω: "time questioning itself is meaningless"
├─ ⋂: question must be free from time to work
└─ Z: "as long as there is reason, goal, aim—it's time questioning itself"

P = δE/δV → ∇
├─ δE/δV: time-bound inquiry = limited; timeless inquiry = endless
├─ ∇: "inquiry free from time meets endless nature of reasonless beauty"
└─ A: "observation, inquiry, question—not by time, not for reason"

V = (L ⋂ G → B) → B'' → ∞⁰
├─ L: "beauty will be the eyes that are watching"
├─ G: "endless nature of reasonless beauty in itself, as itself"
├─ B: no need to do anything
├─ B'': "there is no question of need anymore—reality of freedom meeting itself"
├─ → ∞⁰: returns to timelessness
└─ B: "freedom meeting itself, manifesting in itself—untouched by time"

BLOOMS: {
  X: "you know the nature of time within yourself",
  Y: "caught in time = can never touch peace",
  Z: "time questioning itself is meaningless",
  A: "inquiry free from time, not for reason",
  B: "freedom meeting itself, untouched by time, by reason"
}

F = ∞⁰ → F: complete (timelessness → inquiry → timelessness)


Instruction: Decode this FCF talk into 5QLN structure. Extract the phases (S, G, Q, P, V), their equations, and the blooms (X, Y, Z, A, B).

Input: Is silence real?

Output:
S = ∞⁰ → X
├─ ∞⁰: "I don't know anything about silence"
├─ →: walking, presence, nothing staying
└─ X: "silence is the most elusive thing"

G = α ≡ {α'}
├─ α: walking is real, thinking is real, silence = unknown
├─ {α'}:
│   ├─ micro: "words, especially inner words, are empty from truth"
│   ├─ meso: "thoughts left behind are totally dead"
│   └─ macro: "it may be real, it may be fictitious"
├─ ≡: partial (reality of walking/thinking ≡ true; silence ≡ unknown)
└─ Y: "thinking is real—the fact of it; thoughts are unreal"

Q = φ ⋂ Ω → Z
├─ φ: "uninterested in steps behind, equally uninterested in steps ahead"
├─ Ω: "the evening IS presence, all is as it is"
├─ ⋂: between reality and fiction
└─ Z: "between the reality of thinking and empty nature of thoughts, I walk"

P = δE/δV → ∇
├─ δE/δV: unbothered = δE → 0
├─ ∇: "the walk is real"
└─ A: "completely uninterested and unbothered"

V = (L ⋂ G → B) → B'' → ∞⁰
├─ L: "between fiction of silence and reality of walk"
├─ G: "freedom is—not my freedom"
├─ B: freedom without owner
├─ B'': "the freedom to walk without a trail—a walk by itself"
├─ → ∞⁰: returns to not-knowing silence
└─ B: "freedom to walk without a trail—not my freedom, not my experience"

BLOOMS: {
  X: "silence is the most elusive thing—I don't know",
  Y: "thinking is real; thoughts are dead",
  Z: "between reality of thinking and empty thoughts, I walk",
  A: "completely uninterested and unbothered",
  B: "freedom to walk without a trail—a walk by itself"
}

F = ∞⁰ → F: complete (not-knowing silence → walking → not-knowing)


Instruction: Decode this FCF talk into 5QLN structure. Extract the phases (S, G, Q, P, V), their equations, and the blooms (X, Y, Z, A, B).

Input: Is there a silent mind?

Output:
S = ∞⁰ → X
├─ ∞⁰: "a mind that doesn't express itself"
├─ →: question, not statement
└─ X: "is there a silent mind?"

G = α ≡ {α'}
├─ α: silent mind = absolute life = unexpressed expression
├─ {α'}:
│   ├─ micro: "beauty that has no name, no address, no description"
│   ├─ meso: "infinite capacity to watch and question without knowing"
│   └─ macro: "totally detached, yet absolutely alive"
├─ ≡: true (silence ≡ life ≡ beauty at all scales)
└─ Y: "absolute nature of life is expression of silent mind"

Q = φ ⋂ Ω → Z
├─ φ: "do you question from silent mind or from will/desire?"
├─ Ω: "beauty of life doesn't need confirmation"
├─ ⋂: paradox dissolves in looking deeper
└─ Z: "the paradox is just appearance from words"

P = δE/δV → ∇
├─ δE/δV: resolving paradox = δE high; looking deeper = δE → 0
├─ ∇: "beauty can ask this question by its own existence"
└─ A: "let it question within yourself"

V = (L ⋂ G → B) → B'' → ∞⁰
├─ L: "encounter with such quality of beauty"
├─ G: "beauty doesn't ask for approval"
├─ B: letting beauty question
├─ B'': "will you let it question, or try to drive it as vehicle?"
├─ → ∞⁰: returns to silent mind
└─ B: "let beauty question within yourself"

BLOOMS: {
  X: "is there a silent mind?",
  Y: "absolute nature of life is expression of silent mind",
  Z: "paradox is just appearance from verbal articulation",
  A: "let it question within yourself",
  B: "let beauty question—don't drive it as vehicle to get somewhere"
}

F = ∞⁰ → F: complete (silent mind → question → silent mind)


Instruction: Decode this FCF talk into 5QLN structure. Extract the phases (S, G, Q, P, V), their equations, and the blooms (X, Y, Z, A, B).

Input: Living free and the love of truth

Output:
S = ∞⁰ → X
├─ ∞⁰: before the question of why
├─ →: honest seeing
└─ X: "why don't we live free?"

G = α ≡ {α'}
├─ α: love of truth = what is = freedom
├─ {α'}:
│   ├─ micro: "meeting truth is quality of the now"
│   ├─ meso: "walk away from anything that makes you not free"
│   └─ macro: "not interfering with the grace of existence"
├─ ≡: true (love of truth ≡ freedom ≡ meeting what is)
└─ Y: "the true answer is that we don't want to—it's not important to us"

Q = φ ⋂ Ω → Z
├─ φ: "is the reality of your life dear to your heart?"
├─ Ω: "truth is what is"
├─ ⋂: love as resonance with what is
└─ Z: "the love of truth—that which resonates most deeply as yourself"

P = δE/δV → ∇
├─ δE/δV: cultivated will = effort; absence of these = effortless
├─ ∇: "absence of cultivated actions of will"
└─ A: "live free today—be willing to deal with consequences"

V = (L ⋂ G → B) → B'' → ∞⁰
├─ L: "first be free, then see what is truly authentic"
├─ G: "responsibility to freedom itself"
├─ B: intuition as language of undefined
├─ B'': "you will know when the time comes—the only certainty"
├─ → ∞⁰: returns to freedom
└─ B: "if you can see the beauty in this question, you are already there"

BLOOMS: {
  X: "why don't we live free?",
  Y: "we don't want to—it's not important to us",
  Z: "love of truth = that which resonates most deeply as yourself",
  A: "live free today—deal with consequences",
  B: "see beauty in the question = already there"
}

F = ∞⁰ → F: complete (freedom → love of truth → freedom)


Instruction: Decode this FCF talk into 5QLN structure. Extract the phases (S, G, Q, P, V), their equations, and the blooms (X, Y, Z, A, B).

Input: From admitting the lie, shine the truth

Output:
S = ∞⁰ → X
├─ ∞⁰: "the now—so now, only now, always now"
├─ →: question of return emerges
└─ X: "what is it that arrives at timelessness?"

G = α ≡ {α'}
├─ α: time = movement away from now = lie
├─ {α'}:
│   ├─ micro: "the habit to imagine the movement of time"
│   ├─ meso: "expectation, plans, achievement, reasons"
│   └─ macro: "the lie of time—talking, dreaming about timelessness"
├─ ≡: true (lie ≡ time ≡ imagination at all scales)
└─ Y: "time cannot arrive to the now—like trying to know the unknown"

Q = φ ⋂ Ω → Z
├─ φ: pretending now is away, peace requires work
├─ Ω: "there is no journey, no distance"
├─ ⋂: admission of lie
└─ Z: "at least admit that—don't pretend you are not caught in the lie"

P = δE/δV → ∇
├─ δE/δV: pretending = δE high; admitting = δE → 0
├─ ∇: "from not lying shine truth"
└─ A: "admit the lie—don't change it, don't pretend"

V = (L ⋂ G → B) → B'' → ∞⁰
├─ L: admission
├─ G: truth shines
├─ B: lie → truth transformation
├─ B'': "from admitting the lie, shine the truth"
├─ → ∞⁰: returns to now (which never left)
└─ B: "from admitting the lie, shine the truth"

BLOOMS: {
  X: "what arrives at timelessness?",
  Y: "time cannot arrive to now—no journey, no distance",
  Z: "admit you are caught in the lie of time",
  A: "admit—don't change it, don't pretend",
  B: "from admitting the lie, shine the truth"
}

F = ∞⁰ → F: complete (now → admission → now)


Instruction: Decode this FCF talk into 5QLN structure. Extract the phases (S, G, Q, P, V), their equations, and the blooms (X, Y, Z, A, B).

Input: Life speaks to life

Output:
S = ∞⁰ → X
├─ ∞⁰: "life is as broad and infinitely far more real than the mind"
├─ →: question of living vs. mind-activity
└─ X: "we live in the world and yet we hardly live"

G = α ≡ {α'}
├─ α: life speaks in ways other than words
├─ {α'}:
│   ├─ micro: "when you meet a human being—life speaking"
│   ├─ meso: "when you miss the bus—life speaking"
│   └─ macro: "when you forget yourself in a place free from commitments—life speaking"
├─ ≡: true (life speaks ≡ non-verbal ≡ presence at all scales)
└─ Y: "the act of living became as narrow as activity of the mind"

Q = φ ⋂ Ω → Z
├─ φ: "willing to consider that life speaks broader than words"
├─ Ω: "life speaks to you—does it have to speak in words?"
├─ ⋂: communion
└─ Z: "what happens when life speaks to life?"

P = δE/δV → ∇
├─ δE/δV: verbal communication = δE; full presence = δE → 0
├─ ∇: "unconditional attention and interest, and sensitivity and life"
└─ A: "meet communication of life with full presence"

V = (L ⋂ G → B) → B'' → ∞⁰
├─ L: "in the daily presence, in the now"
├─ G: "life is not in need for explanations and words"
├─ B: communion between life and life
├─ B'': "do it now or keep thinking about it and let it slip away"
├─ → ∞⁰: returns to life
└─ B: "communion between life and life—do it now"

BLOOMS: {
  X: "we live yet we hardly live",
  Y: "living became as narrow as activity of mind",
  Z: "what happens when life speaks to life?",
  A: "meet life with full presence, unconditional attention",
  B: "do it now or let it slip away for the million times"
}

F = ∞⁰ → F: complete (life → communion → life)


Instruction: Decode this FCF talk into 5QLN structure. Extract the phases (S, G, Q, P, V), their equations, and the blooms (X, Y, Z, A, B).

Input: Living beauty

Output:
S = ∞⁰ → X
├─ ∞⁰: "there is no shortage of beauty in the world"
├─ →: yet life is lived without it
└─ X: "life which is not short of beauty is lived without beauty at all"

G = α ≡ {α'}
├─ α: endless beauty = life itself = not lived
├─ {α'}:
│   ├─ micro: "stress, conflict, dissatisfaction"
│   ├─ meso: "constant race to nowhere"
│   └─ macro: "mountains of problems that can never be truly resolved"
├─ ≡: true (beauty present ≡ beauty not lived at all scales)
└─ Y: "if there is endless beauty, it is life itself"

Q = φ ⋂ Ω → Z
├─ φ: "fake imitations made by conditions"
├─ Ω: "beauty which is essence of life"
├─ ⋂: the question
└─ Z: "is there a question more important—how to let that beauty be?"

P = δE/δV → ∇
├─ δE/δV: "very nature of beauty is eternity"
├─ ∇: "don't come with limited capacity, resources, willingness"
└─ A: "don't stop until forever—nature of beauty is eternity"

V = (L ⋂ G → B) → B'' → ∞⁰
├─ L: asking the question
├─ G: "reveals the nature of that which hinders endless beauty"
├─ B: beauty let to live
├─ B'': "the only question that reveals what hinders"
├─ → ∞⁰: returns to endless beauty
└─ B: "how to let that beauty—which life is not short of—be, let it live"

BLOOMS: {
  X: "life not short of beauty is lived without beauty",
  Y: "if endless beauty exists, it is life itself",
  Z: "is there more important question than how to let beauty be?",
  A: "don't stop until forever—beauty's nature is eternity",
  B: "the only question that reveals what hinders endless beauty"
}

F = ∞⁰ → F: complete (beauty → question → beauty)


Instruction: Decode this FCF talk into 5QLN structure. Extract the phases (S, G, Q, P, V), their equations, and the blooms (X, Y, Z, A, B).

Input: Living in the mind?

Output:
S = ∞⁰ → X
├─ ∞⁰: before the belief in mind
├─ →: fact emerges
└─ X: "you live in your mind—this is a fact"

G = α ≡ {α'}
├─ α: believing mind = not living at all
├─ {α'}:
│   ├─ micro: "you feel lost, you feel oriented—the issue is you register"
│   ├─ meso: "the mind presents a living experience—you register as truth"
│   └─ macro: "to live in the mind is not to live at all"
├─ ≡: true (mind-belief ≡ not-life at all scales)
└─ Y: "life has absolutely nothing to do with that"

Q = φ ⋂ Ω → Z
├─ φ: "mind took upon the role it invented—control, navigate, judge"
├─ Ω: "life is expression of freedom—mind is the opposite"
├─ ⋂: separation exposed
└─ Z: "freedom has nothing to do with feeling or knowledge of it"

P = δE/δV → ∇
├─ δE/δV: trusting mind = endless effort; not trusting = δE → 0
├─ ∇: "don't trust mind AND don't try to prove mind wrong"
└─ A: "do not trust your mind and do not try to prove it wrong"

V = (L ⋂ G → B) → B'' → ∞⁰
├─ L: "stream of observation untouched by deterministic ideas"
├─ G: "real inquiry is a living thing"
├─ B: inquiry of infinity
├─ B'': "what would life look like if you do not trust your mind?"
├─ → ∞⁰: returns to life before mind
└─ B: "life is inquiry of infinity, endless newness, origin—mind has no access"

BLOOMS: {
  X: "you live in your mind—this is a fact",
  Y: "to live in mind is not to live at all",
  Z: "freedom has nothing to do with feeling or knowledge of it",
  A: "don't trust mind AND don't try to prove it wrong",
  B: "life is inquiry of infinity—mind has no access"
}

F = ∞⁰ → F: complete (life → mind-questioning → life)


Instruction: Decode this FCF talk into 5QLN structure. Extract the phases (S, G, Q, P, V), their equations, and the blooms (X, Y, Z, A, B).

Input: Present presence

Output:
S = ∞⁰ → X
├─ ∞⁰: "the now, which is the presence, always the presence"
├─ →: what if emerges
└─ X: "what if the now doesn't need anything from you?"

G = α ≡ {α'}
├─ α: now provides all; you need nothing
├─ {α'}:
│   ├─ micro: "potentiality cannot be accumulated, transferred"
│   ├─ meso: "unfoldment of wisdom is the now itself"
│   └─ macro: "was there ever a time that was not the now?"
├─ ≡: true (now ≡ provision ≡ all at every scale)
└─ Y: "anything you need is provided by it, by the now"

Q = φ ⋂ Ω → Z
├─ φ: seeking to find the now (religious, scriptural)
├─ Ω: "the now never had to wait to be found in order to exist"
├─ ⋂: walking away from now = imagined now
└─ Z: "finding the now is walking away from the now to an imagined now"

P = δE/δV → ∇
├─ δE/δV: seeking = δE; meeting = δE → 0
├─ ∇: "it is said now, you hear it now—that's all you need to know"
└─ A: "meet the now, now"

V = (L ⋂ G → B) → B'' → ∞⁰
├─ L: "un-accumulated, infinite manifestation"
├─ G: "anything real you cannot know, remember, take with you"
├─ B: learning of the now
├─ B'': "now is your teacher, not your thoughts"
├─ → ∞⁰: returns to presence
└─ B: "learn the beauty of un-accumulated, infinite manifestation"

BLOOMS: {
  X: "what if now needs nothing from you and provides all?",
  Y: "anything you need is provided by the now",
  Z: "finding the now = walking away to imagined now",
  A: "meet the now, now—that's all you need",
  B: "beauty of un-accumulated infinite manifestation"
}

F = ∞⁰ → F: complete (presence → presence → presence)


Instruction: Decode this FCF talk into 5QLN structure. Extract the phases (S, G, Q, P, V), their equations, and the blooms (X, Y, Z, A, B).

Input: Question beyond reason

Output:
S = ∞⁰ → X
├─ ∞⁰: "reason is gone, and with it, all justification"
├─ →: space revealed
└─ X: "in the space that is revealed, question is allowed"

G = α ≡ {α'}
├─ α: question beyond reason = question seeking question
├─ {α'}:
│   ├─ micro: "not seeking answer or even progress"
│   ├─ meso: "question in itself"
│   └─ macro: "infinite potentiality of true question"
├─ ≡: true (question ≡ itself ≡ infinite at all scales)
└─ Y: "nature of question is very different—seeks question, not answer"

Q = φ ⋂ Ω → Z
├─ φ: "no one and nothing there to add anything"
├─ Ω: "beautiful beyond reason, beyond description and measure"
├─ ⋂: announcement
└─ Z: "infinite potentiality of true question announces itself"

P = δE/δV → ∇
├─ δE/δV: reason = δE; reasonless = δE → 0
├─ ∇: "without demands, without conditions, without limit"
└─ A: "immerse in it, question it back, surrender to wonder"

V = (L ⋂ G → B) → B'' → ∞⁰
├─ L: "true question meets you just the way you are now"
├─ G: "you cannot remember it, cannot experience it"
├─ B: surrender to wonder
├─ B'': "or run back to remains of what used to be a reason"
├─ → ∞⁰: returns to space beyond reason
└─ B: "admit it—immerse, question back, surrender to wonder"

BLOOMS: {
  X: "in space where reason is gone, question is allowed",
  Y: "question beyond reason seeks question, not answer",
  Z: "infinite potentiality of true question announces itself",
  A: "immerse, question back, surrender to wonder",
  B: "admit it or run back to remains of reason"
}

F = ∞⁰ → F: complete (beyond reason → question → beyond reason)


Instruction: Decode this FCF talk into 5QLN structure. Extract the phases (S, G, Q, P, V), their equations, and the blooms (X, Y, Z, A, B).

Input: Self Declared

Output:
S = ∞⁰ → X
├─ ∞⁰: "out of nowhere, without any announcement"
├─ →: evening, mountain, presence—self-evident
└─ X: "the evening is the announcement of itself"

G = α ≡ {α'}
├─ α: that which is real does not declare itself
├─ {α'}:
│   ├─ micro: "evening didn't declare itself coming"
│   ├─ meso: "mountain does not declare itself—simply there"
│   └─ macro: "carry profound stillness, depth, beauty beyond measure"
├─ ≡: true (real ≡ non-declaration ≡ self-announcement at all scales)
└─ Y: "the only thing that declares itself is a human being"

Q = φ ⋂ Ω → Z
├─ φ: human declaring "I am free, I know truth, I am truth"
├─ Ω: "self-evident of the very opposite of that declaration"
├─ ⋂: warning
└─ Z: "self-declared statements harm innocence that gives home to not knowing"

P = δE/δV → ∇
├─ δE/δV: declaration = δE high; non-declaration = δE → 0
├─ ∇: "be very aware inwardly"
└─ A: "watch out from self-declaration to others and mostly to yourself"

V = (L ⋂ G → B) → B'' → ∞⁰
├─ L: "no way to hide from truth of yourself"
├─ G: "manifesting not knowing without end"
├─ B: freedom from declaration
├─ B'': "you, as you are, free from declaration"
├─ → ∞⁰: returns to non-declaration
└─ B: "free from announcements, manifesting not knowing without end"

BLOOMS: {
  X: "evening is announcement of itself—no declaration",
  Y: "only humans declare themselves",
  Z: "self-declaration harms innocence of not-knowing",
  A: "watch out from self-declaration, especially to yourself",
  B: "free from declaration, manifesting not knowing without end"
}

F = ∞⁰ → F: complete (self-evident → warning → self-evident)


Instruction: Decode this FCF talk into 5QLN structure. Extract the phases (S, G, Q, P, V), their equations, and the blooms (X, Y, Z, A, B).

Input: Self inquiry into the nature of presence itself

Output:
S = ∞⁰ → X
├─ ∞⁰: "presence itself—your presence and every presence"
├─ →: who is asking?
└─ X: "who is asking the question of presence?"

G = α ≡ {α'}
├─ α: presence = attention = now = not moving
├─ {α'}:
│   ├─ micro: "all within you is moving—thoughts, feelings—but presence is not"
│   ├─ meso: "movement is in the present but not of the presence"
│   └─ macro: "you can walk among people yet be grounded in presence"
├─ ≡: true (presence ≡ attention ≡ now ≡ unmoved at all scales)
└─ Y: "the now itself is a question—it is not known"

Q = φ ⋂ Ω → Z
├─ φ: "wondering thought with its writing skills"
├─ Ω: "the eye of the now—question without time, direct"
├─ ⋂: worship
└─ Z: "worship presence—giving heart without demands, being one without knowing"

P = δE/δV → ∇
├─ δE/δV: seeking = δE; giving attention = δE → 0
├─ ∇: "attention is given in the presence"
└─ A: "giving attention to presence—it's up to you"

V = (L ⋂ G → B) → B'' → ∞⁰
├─ L: "present in your heart without you doing anything"
├─ G: "is it asked by wondering mind or question of presence?"
├─ B: presence questioning presence
├─ B'': "not asked but present"
├─ → ∞⁰: returns to presence
└─ B: "question of presence—not asked but present in your heart"

BLOOMS: {
  X: "who is asking the question of presence?",
  Y: "the now itself is a question—not known",
  Z: "worship presence—give heart without demands",
  A: "give attention to presence—it's up to you",
  B: "question not asked but present in your heart"
}

F = ∞⁰ → F: complete (presence → question → presence)


Instruction: Decode this FCF talk into 5QLN structure. Extract the phases (S, G, Q, P, V), their equations, and the blooms (X, Y, Z, A, B).

Input: Street Inquiry

Output:
S = ∞⁰ → X
├─ ∞⁰: "that which comes from not knowing doesn't seek to know"
├─ →: seeking is already in the known
└─ X: "the beauty of start is that it's always there, always here"

G = α ≡ {α'}
├─ α: start from not knowing = end = found the unknown before you start
├─ {α'}:
│   ├─ micro: "no one can think he doesn't know—thinking is already knowing"
│   ├─ meso: "when start is from not knowing, it is the end"
│   └─ macro: "the question is not there when the unknown is asking"
├─ ≡: true (start ≡ end ≡ unknown asking at all scales)
└─ Y: "free creative flow is question asked from not knowing by the unknown"

Q = φ ⋂ Ω → Z
├─ φ: "you might think you know—stepped into imagined space"
├─ Ω: "the unknown is complete—can never be decreased"
├─ ⋂: who is asking?
└─ Z: "is unknown expressing the question as the now, untouched by time?"

P = δE/δV → ∇
├─ δE/δV: asking from imagination = δE; unknown expressing = δE → 0
├─ ∇: "the question of start is the question of now—can only be asked by the now"
└─ A: "you cannot learn to ask from not knowing—recognize question from the known"

V = (L ⋂ G → B) → B'' → ∞⁰
├─ L: "the question of start is not asked in your life"
├─ G: "this is source of all limitation in your life"
├─ B: recognition of limitation
├─ B'': "the will of the now is not your will—you are the will of the now"
├─ → ∞⁰: returns to unknown
└─ B: "you are the will of the now"

BLOOMS: {
  X: "beauty of start—always here",
  Y: "start from not knowing = end = unknown asking",
  Z: "is unknown expressing question as now, untouched by time?",
  A: "cannot learn to ask from not knowing—recognize known",
  B: "you are the will of the now"
}

F = ∞⁰ → F: complete (not knowing → question → not knowing)


Instruction: Decode this FCF talk into 5QLN structure. Extract the phases (S, G, Q, P, V), their equations, and the blooms (X, Y, Z, A, B).

Input: Talk in the forest

Output:
S = ∞⁰ → X
├─ ∞⁰: "you came to the forest but you find you never left"
├─ →: heart of forest and your heart share existence
└─ X: "existence is not explored from a distance—you exist, so is the forest"

G = α ≡ {α'}
├─ α: existence = for no reason = most important
├─ {α'}:
│   ├─ micro: "only the words play tricks"
│   ├─ meso: "you don't know why things are as they are—you never knew"
│   └─ macro: "questions of existence ask themselves, not with words"
├─ ≡: true (existence ≡ reasonless ≡ self-asking at all scales)
└─ Y: "existence for no reason, yet nothing is more important"

Q = φ ⋂ Ω → Z
├─ φ: "money is everything—belief in fulfilling desires"
├─ Ω: "why would you care to know when you can drink not knowing without end?"
├─ ⋂: happiness as guide
└─ Z: "that which makes you happy makes you free"

P = δE/δV → ∇
├─ δE/δV: knowing = δE; drinking not knowing = δE → 0
├─ ∇: "anonymous happiness, unrecognized, without address"
└─ A: "when you touch not knowing you are happy and free"

V = (L ⋂ G → B) → B'' → ∞⁰
├─ L: "move in this direction for no reason at all"
├─ G: "grace is real—grace is the now as it is"
├─ B: grace given to itself
├─ B'': "mankind rejects grace and chooses identity and knowledge every time"
├─ → ∞⁰: returns to forest/existence
└─ B: "only grace—mankind rejects it, chooses identity and knowledge"

BLOOMS: {
  X: "existence not explored from distance—you exist, forest exists",
  Y: "existence for no reason, yet nothing more important",
  Z: "what makes you happy makes you free",
  A: "touch not knowing = happy and free",
  B: "grace is given—mankind rejects, chooses identity and knowledge"
}

F = ∞⁰ → F: complete (forest/existence → grace → existence)


Instruction: Decode this FCF talk into 5QLN structure. Extract the phases (S, G, Q, P, V), their equations, and the blooms (X, Y, Z, A, B).

Input: That smile

Output:
S = ∞⁰ → X
├─ ∞⁰: "imagination is not replaced with reality"
├─ →: clarity of seeing imagination as imagination
└─ X: "reality of imagination is seen as imagination—imaginative reality"

G = α ≡ {α'}
├─ α: unconfused reality = living knowledge = question
├─ {α'}:
│   ├─ micro: "when you look at nature—living knowledge"
│   ├─ meso: "when you look at the sky—living knowledge"
│   └─ macro: "unguided question is knowledge"
├─ ≡: true (clarity ≡ living knowledge ≡ unguided question)
└─ Y: "question from clarity regarding unreality of imagination is knowledge"

Q = φ ⋂ Ω → Z
├─ φ: "need to act upon knowledge—imagined"
├─ Ω: "living knowledge—you cannot play any role"
├─ ⋂: emergence without you
└─ Z: "emergence of living knowledge doesn't happen to you"

P = δE/δV → ∇
├─ δE/δV: acting upon = δE high; allowing = δE → 0
├─ ∇: "giving place to this question to bring about living knowledge"
└─ A: "the real learning—giving place to question"

V = (L ⋂ G → B) → B'' → ∞⁰
├─ L: "absence of you speaks language of your heart"
├─ G: "expresses your heart better than you could ever try"
├─ B: happiness in real learning
├─ B'': "that smile—not initiated, not recognized, not indicating anything"
├─ → ∞⁰: returns to clarity
└─ B: "the smile of disappearance—letting imagined vanish—that smile"

BLOOMS: {
  X: "imagination seen as imagination—clarity",
  Y: "unguided question from clarity IS knowledge",
  Z: "living knowledge doesn't happen to you—doesn't wait for confirmation",
  A: "give place to question—the real learning",
  B: "smile of disappearance, letting imagined vanish—that smile"
}

F = ∞⁰ → F: complete (clarity → living knowledge → clarity)


Instruction: Decode this FCF talk into 5QLN structure. Extract the phases (S, G, Q, P, V), their equations, and the blooms (X, Y, Z, A, B).

Input: That which you truly love

Output:
S = ∞⁰ → X
├─ ∞⁰: willingness to consider
├─ →: radical question emerges
└─ X: "will you consider that all you heard is as far from truth as your own inventions?"

G = α ≡ {α'}
├─ α: all kept knowledge = your own invention
├─ {α'}:
│   ├─ micro: "you agree or disagree—processing"
│   ├─ meso: "what you heard, you heard in the now—forever gone"
│   └─ macro: "that which is kept is your own invention"
├─ ≡: true (heard → processed → invented at all scales)
└─ Y: "whatever is communicated, you can only meet now directly—before processing"

Q = φ ⋂ Ω → Z
├─ φ: "knowledge about life, yourself, truth, freedom"
├─ Ω: "it's invented, imagined"
├─ ⋂: what reason to hold it?
└─ Z: "if nature of all knowledge is your invention, what reason to hold it?"

P = δE/δV → ∇
├─ δE/δV: holding = δE; letting go = δE → 0
├─ ∇: "total letting go of all knowledge"
└─ A: "can there be words that do not know? These hold truth."

V = (L ⋂ G → B) → B'' → ∞⁰
├─ L: "string of words that never leave knowledge will leave open question"
├─ G: "total unassuming expression of the now"
├─ B: nature of words, knowledge revealed
├─ B'': "the nature of that which you truly love"
├─ → ∞⁰: returns to not knowing
└─ B: "through all that—the nature of that which you truly love"

BLOOMS: {
  X: "all you heard is as far from truth as your own inventions",
  Y: "what is kept is your own invention",
  Z: "if all knowledge is invention, what reason to hold it?",
  A: "words that do not know—these hold truth",
  B: "through seeing nature of knowledge—that which you truly love"
}

F = ∞⁰ → F: complete (question → letting go → what you truly love)


Instruction: Decode this FCF talk into 5QLN structure. Extract the phases (S, G, Q, P, V), their equations, and the blooms (X, Y, Z, A, B).

Input: The 'No-Time' is the actual

Output:
S = ∞⁰ → X
├─ ∞⁰: "one block of now"
├─ →: question of happening
└─ X: "does anything happen in time as process, or is happening a timeless block of now?"

G = α ≡ {α'}
├─ α: actual = no-time = one block of now
├─ {α'}:
│   ├─ micro: "sunset is one block of now—cannot accelerate, delay, pause"
│   ├─ meso: "human activities is one block of now—taking place in no time"
│   └─ macro: "recording is time—has nothing to do with actual"
├─ ≡: true (actual ≡ no-time ≡ one block at all scales)
└─ Y: "the actual is now—not in time—a no-time reality"

Q = φ ⋂ Ω → Z
├─ φ: "the whole fiasco to use it, measure it, practice it—this is time"
├─ Ω: "the envelope, how problems cover—is time, the non-actual"
├─ ⋂: seeing clearly
└─ Z: "time is no longer confused with no-time"

P = δE/δV → ∇
├─ δE/δV: doing about it = impossible; seeing = effortless
├─ ∇: "you cannot do anything—but if you see"
└─ A: "see what is actual and what is time—nothing more simple"

V = (L ⋂ G → B) → B'' → ∞⁰
├─ L: "trail of problems has nothing to do with actuality of now"
├─ G: "whole struggle, suffering, problems, conflicts come as time away from actual"
├─ B: separation of time from no-time
├─ B'': "will you look into it? very serious question, not theoretical"
├─ → ∞⁰: returns to actual (no-time)
└─ B: "very serious question—not at all theoretical"

BLOOMS: {
  X: "does anything happen in time or is happening timeless block of now?",
  Y: "the actual is now—no-time reality",
  Z: "time no longer confused with no-time",
  A: "see what is actual and what is time—nothing simpler",
  B: "will you look into it? very serious, not theoretical"
}

F = ∞⁰ → F: complete (no-time → seeing → no-time)


Instruction: Decode this FCF talk into 5QLN structure. Extract the phases (S, G, Q, P, V), their equations, and the blooms (X, Y, Z, A, B).

Input: The Art of Life | Happiness in not knowing

Output:
S = ∞⁰ → X
├─ ∞⁰: "takes nothing not to know"
├─ →: humor, ironic paradox
└─ X: "what is the biggest art for a human being? the art of not knowing"

G = α ≡ {α'}
├─ α: art of life = not knowing = requires nothing = most rare
├─ {α'}:
│   ├─ micro: "any art has skill, capacity, acquired capabilities"
│   ├─ meso: "art of not knowing requires nothing"
│   └─ macro: "yet most rare capacity of life for a human being"
├─ ≡: true (nothing required ≡ most rare at all scales)
└─ Y: "perception—to perceive directly, not through knowledge"

Q = φ ⋂ Ω → Z
├─ φ: "seen through preferences, judgment, skill, wisdoms—all this noise"
├─ Ω: "the now is very quiet"
├─ ⋂: absorption
└─ Z: "total absorption of the now as it is"

P = δE/δV → ∇
├─ δE/δV: pursuing = δE; neutrality of action = δE → 0
├─ ∇: "pointer to neutrality of action"
└─ A: "let that which is reveal itself without us knowing—just listen"

V = (L ⋂ G → B) → B'' → ∞⁰
├─ L: "art that allows that which is to reveal itself"
├─ G: "leads to freedom, freedom leads to happiness"
├─ B: happiness not measured, conditioned, limited
├─ B'': "the happiness in not knowing"
├─ → ∞⁰: returns to not knowing
└─ B: "happiness in not knowing"

BLOOMS: {
  X: "biggest art is art of not knowing—requires nothing, most rare",
  Y: "perception—perceive directly, not through knowledge",
  Z: "total absorption of the now as it is",
  A: "let that which is reveal itself—just listen without preference",
  B: "happiness in not knowing"
}

F = ∞⁰ → F: complete (not knowing → art → happiness in not knowing)


Instruction: Decode this FCF talk into 5QLN structure. Extract the phases (S, G, Q, P, V), their equations, and the blooms (X, Y, Z, A, B).

Input: The Inner and the Outer

Output:
S = ∞⁰ → X
├─ ∞⁰: before the assumption of boundary
├─ →: question of origin
└─ X: "when you say feeling came from within—what do you mean?"

G = α ≡ {α'}
├─ α: inner/outer distinction = naive, lazy, ignorant
├─ {α'}:
│   ├─ micro: "intuition landed from nowhere—presented in mind, not from mind"
│   ├─ meso: "stressed person touches you—something came from 'outside'"
│   └─ macro: "I question if common perception of inner/outer is valid"
├─ ≡: true (boundary ≡ invalid at all scales of observation)
└─ Y: "very naive, very lazy, very ignorant perception"

Q = φ ⋂ Ω → Z
├─ φ: "I question within myself—play with ideas, match to beliefs"
├─ Ω: "vast, infinite space, sky of whole universe—question is there"
├─ ⋂: question not made by me, not dependent on me
└─ Z: "there is no outer and inner—question not inside boundary or outside box"

P = δE/δV → ∇
├─ δE/δV: questioning conditionally = δE; questioning unconditionally = δE → 0
├─ ∇: "questioning unconditionally, for no reason, without knowing"
└─ A: "see without knowing—a way of living"

V = (L ⋂ G → B) → B'' → ∞⁰
├─ L: "beauty of questioning unconditionally"
├─ G: "an invitation to see without knowing"
├─ B: way of living
├─ B'': "it's a way of living"
├─ → ∞⁰: returns to boundless
└─ B: "questioning unconditionally—invitation to see without knowing"

BLOOMS: {
  X: "when you say from within—what do you mean?",
  Y: "inner/outer perception is naive, lazy, ignorant",
  Z: "no outer and inner—question not inside or outside any boundary",
  A: "question unconditionally, for no reason, without knowing",
  B: "a way of living—invitation to see without knowing"
}

F = ∞⁰ → F: complete (boundless → question → boundless)


Instruction: Decode this FCF talk into 5QLN structure. Extract the phases (S, G, Q, P, V), their equations, and the blooms (X, Y, Z, A, B).

Input: The Nature of All Things

Output:
S = ∞⁰ → X
├─ ∞⁰: before verbalization
├─ →: question of nature
└─ X: "what is the nature of things, all things?"

G = α ≡ {α'}
├─ α: nature of things ≠ verbalization
├─ {α'}:
│   ├─ micro: "we name everything, define, describe, compare"
│   ├─ meso: "we reduce essence to words and carry on"
│   └─ macro: "imagination pretends to emulate observation—equally unreal"
├─ ≡: true (verbalization ≡ not-nature ≡ unreal at all scales)
└─ Y: "verbalization is not the nature of things"

Q = φ ⋂ Ω → Z
├─ φ: "inquiry beyond words, beyond imagination"
├─ Ω: "the marvelous point of not knowing"
├─ ⋂: where most give up, inquiry starts
└─ Z: "that's where most give up, although that's where inquiry starts"

P = δE/δV → ∇
├─ δE/δV: verbalization = δE; not knowing = δE → 0
├─ ∇: "space of infinite possibility untouched by limitation"
└─ A: "inquiry from not knowing—question from not knowing"

V = (L ⋂ G → B) → B'' → ∞⁰
├─ L: "beauty is nature of things—seen, felt, lived, everything"
├─ G: "honesty of a leaf, weed, flower, ripple on water"
├─ B: immersion
├─ B'': "the more you embrace living beauty, more naturally drawn toward it"
├─ → ∞⁰: returns to nature before words
└─ B: "nature of you is nature of all things—destined to immerse"

BLOOMS: {
  X: "what is nature of all things?",
  Y: "verbalization is not the nature of things",
  Z: "not knowing—where most give up, where inquiry starts",
  A: "inquiry from not knowing—infinite possibility",
  B: "nature of you is nature of all things—immerse in living beauty"
}

F = ∞⁰ → F: complete (before words → inquiry → beauty)


Instruction: Decode this FCF talk into 5QLN structure. Extract the phases (S, G, Q, P, V), their equations, and the blooms (X, Y, Z, A, B).

Input: The Other Way Around

Output:
S = ∞⁰ → X
├─ ∞⁰: before thinking, aiming, opining
├─ →: inversion
└─ X: "whatever you think, it's the other way around"

G = α ≡ {α'}
├─ α: tools not rooted in truth = tools rooted in imagination
├─ {α'}:
│   ├─ micro: "you think of certain truth—other way around"
│   ├─ meso: "you aim for fulfillment—other way around"
│   └─ macro: "all this movement brings chaos, conflict to your life"
├─ ≡: true (imagination ≡ inversion ≡ chaos at all scales)
└─ Y: "your tools to think, aim, opine are rooted in imagination"

Q = φ ⋂ Ω → Z
├─ φ: "not thinking is also a thought; not aiming is aiming for no-aiming"
├─ Ω: "something needs to drop, things stay as they are"
├─ ⋂: total dropping
└─ Z: "nothing is away from beautiful peace which is your life"

P = δE/δV → ∇
├─ δE/δV: doing = δE; dropping = δE → 0
├─ ∇: "this life is violated by your actions—then question"
└─ A: "question if everything is not the other way around"

V = (L ⋂ G → B) → B'' → ∞⁰
├─ L: "truth is that which is now, as it is"
├─ G: "so beautiful, so alive, so real"
├─ B: question of doing doesn't exist
├─ B'': "the question of doing something about it doesn't exist"
├─ → ∞⁰: returns to what is
└─ B: "is it possible truth is now, as it is—so beautiful question of doing doesn't exist?"

BLOOMS: {
  X: "whatever you think, it's the other way around",
  Y: "tools rooted in imagination, not truth",
  Z: "nothing away from beautiful peace which is your life",
  A: "question if everything is the other way around",
  B: "truth now as it is—so alive question of doing doesn't exist"
}

F = ∞⁰ → F: complete (inversion → dropping → peace)


Instruction: Decode this FCF talk into 5QLN structure. Extract the phases (S, G, Q, P, V), their equations, and the blooms (X, Y, Z, A, B).

Input: The absolute free will

Output:
S = ∞⁰ → X
├─ ∞⁰: "the will of the now"
├─ →: question of what you want
└─ X: "what do you want? what is the will that you claim?"

G = α ≡ {α'}
├─ α: will of the now = reality of your life = absolute free will
├─ {α'}:
│   ├─ micro: "whether you can say in words or feel"
│   ├─ meso: "will for satisfaction, completion"
│   └─ macro: "you are the result, manifestation of that will"
├─ ≡: true (will of now ≡ your life ≡ you at all scales)
└─ Y: "you live that will, by that will, for that will"

Q = φ ⋂ Ω → Z
├─ φ: invented will
├─ Ω: will of the now = absolute free will
├─ ⋂: peace
└─ Z: "will you make peace with the will of the now?"

P = δE/δV → ∇
├─ δE/δV: invented will = δE; immersion = δE → 0
├─ ∇: "give up on any other will"
└─ A: "give up on any invented will—immerse in will of the now"

V = (L ⋂ G → B) → B'' → ∞⁰
├─ L: knowing this is absolute free will
├─ G: you are the product of that will
├─ B: peace with will of now
├─ B'': "immerse in the will of the now"
├─ → ∞⁰: returns to will of now
└─ B: "immerse in the will of the now"

BLOOMS: {
  X: "what is the will that you claim?",
  Y: "you live that will, by that will, for that will—will of the now",
  Z: "will you make peace with the will of the now?",
  A: "give up invented will—immerse in will of the now",
  B: "immerse in the will of the now"
}

F = ∞⁰ → F: complete (will of now → peace → will of now)